Contact Aaron Morris
Morris & Stone, LLP
Orchard Technology Park
11 Orchard Road, Suite 106
Lake Forest, CA 92630
(714) 954-0700
morris@toplawfirm.com-
Recent Wisdom
- Settlement Agreement Enforceable under 664.6, Even Though it Contemplated a Written Version
- How to Correct False Medical Records
- Think Twice Before You Call the Police
- How to Get Documents from Your HOA
- Bell v. Feibush — Six Years Later
- What you can do when your HOA’s Architectural Committee denies your request
- What you can do when you are behind on your HOA dues
- The Girl in the Red Bikini — A Facebook Tale
- Jury Gets it Right – AEG Live Not Responsible for Michael Jackson’s Death
- Defamation is Bad, but it Doesn’t Justify Chilling Free Speech
Blogroll
Notice
NOTICE PURSUANT TO BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE SECTION 6158.3: The outcome of any case will depend on the facts specific to that case. Nothing contained in any portion of this web site should be taken as a representation of how your particular case would be concluded, or even that a case with similar facts will have a similar result. The result of any case discussed herein was dependent on the facts of that case, and the results will differ if based on different facts. Any testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.
Category Archives: Article
Defamation is Bad, but it Doesn’t Justify Chilling Free Speech
Our neighbors to the North are very American-like, until you get to issues of free speech. Most view Canada as the “least protective of free speech in the English-speaking world.” Reasonable minds can differ on some of Canada’s laws, such … Continue reading
Demand Letters Can Stray Into Civil Extortion — Miguel Mendoza v. Reed K. Hamzeh
If the threat of getting in trouble with the State Bar is not enough, maybe the threat of both civil and criminals actions will get attorneys to toe the line. You know that it is an ethical violation for an … Continue reading
Appeal Victory: Treble Damages for Theft Affirmed Against Defendant
Bell v. Igal Feibush: Treble Damages Awarded for Theft by False Pretext As we reported in October of 2011, we persuaded an Orange County Superior Court Judge to apply Penal Code section 496(c) – making it illegal to receive stolen … Continue reading
Australian Defamation Case Illustrates Life Without the CDA
I have frequently written here on the pros and cons of the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”). Without it, no website could permit comments, but by the same token it allows unscrupulous website operators to encourage defamatory postings, and then use … Continue reading
Gloating Over $5,000 Settlement Costs Parents $234,011.87
Some callers to my office, wanting to sue for defamation because someone said terrible, false and hurtful things about them, are disappointed to learn that they cannot seek legal action because the speech falls under a privilege. By definition, “privileged” … Continue reading
How to Fight Back Against Online Defamation
Always striving not to reinvent the wheel, I keep my eyes open for articles that do a good job of explaining basic legal concepts. In that regard, I receive many calls from prospective clients who don’t yet know the fundamentals of … Continue reading
Judges Must be Wary of Anti-SLAPP Appeal Trap
A few months back I won on an anti-SLAPP motion that I brought long after the case was filed. The thing is, I was not representing the Defendant initially, but when I was retained the first thing I saw from … Continue reading
Morris & Stone Gets Triple Damages and Attorney Fees for Theft
When is a breach of contract also fraud? When the party never intended to perform. When do you get triple damages and all of your attorney fees for fraud? When you hire Morris & Stone (although your results could differ). … Continue reading
The Legality of the “Tip Jar”
Back in June of 2009, I wrote about the Starbucks tipping case. Some rascally class action attorneys had won a huge payday, claiming that Starbucks was violating the sanctity of the community tip jar. You see, Labor Code section 351 … Continue reading